3 ms·
I am all right with that, as I don't think my privacy is sensitive to the agent, my email just normal email, no terrorism, no child porn, no drug etc, why I wou
by taobility 9y ago
I am all right with that, as I don't think my privacy is sensitive to the agent, my email just normal email, no terrorism, no child porn, no drug etc, why I would care they check it or not. Apple, Google, Microsoft already scan all your online activities, why would they better than the government? You guys always trying to mix the privacy and security. for the iPhone case, in case the police need to unlock the iPhone to save hundreds of people's life, are you guys still insist that Apple shouldn't unlock the iPhone for the cops?
- sebmeister 9y agoEven if you do not care about the complete loss of privacy, are you not wary about the methods for accessing the backdoors leaking to criminals and antagonist governments? Which has already happened, see Vault 7 and numerous other leaks.
- petre 9y agoS/He will start caring when s/he will be arrested because of a May joke or a neighbour denouncing him/her of being a terrorist. That is how it worked in communist countries. Neighbour issues? Just write a denouncement and file it. The Stasi will do the rest.
- taobility 9y agoin which communist country? are you still living in cold war time?
- petre 9y agoIn just about every communist country. No, but I lived in a commie country in the 80s and that's how things worked: microphones in your home, the secret police forever taping your phone line, informant neighbours, state propaganda, different radio bands so you won't listen to foreign media etc.
- Operyl 9y agoHe was making a joke about you using will vs would for your Stasi comment I think.
- nickbauman 9y agoNo amount of loss of privacy will stop terrorism. They're not substitutable.