> A military whose first line of defense is nuclear weapons is not a functioning military. What's the relevance of this statement towards OP? Reducing nuke doe

> A military whose first line of defense is nuclear weapons is not a functioning military. What's the relevance of this statement towards OP? Reducing nuke does not harm US' strategic supremacy at all. The current arsenal is plainly too much... It's dead simple to reduce cost and still maintain the same strategic position. But you know what, USA won't do it...