> (they're usually have their own group - guess why?) Self-segregation, so in-vogue nowadays. That, by the way, is also not the way to do things. > No review

> (they're usually have their own group - guess why?) Self-segregation, so in-vogue nowadays. That, by the way, is also not the way to do things. > No review process is more fair. But if you end up with all-X selections from a blind-review, you may be advertising to a very homogeneous culture. As a result, you may be limiting your pool of ideas to choose from and reaching only a local maximum. There are usually great non-X engineers, as long as you reach out to them. Mixing multiple varied-X groups usually results in more diverse discussions and ideas, in my experience. Moving the goalposts, as usual for this kind of crowd. What would be your way to blame everyone but the people not submitting papers if you were told that the organizers did reach out as many different groups as possible? I know of several, I'm just curious to read which you'll use.