3 ms·
Not necessarily, but it's really hard to say without them being more open about what their goals were in the first place! Like maybe they were trying to get so
by charlescearl 9y ago
Not necessarily, but it's really hard to say without them being more open about what their goals were in the first place!
Like maybe they were trying to get some legit outreach going but it fell through, who knows?
To me, the work of Baldwin, Ta-Nehisi Coates is that the dialog around racism has to be open, transparent, honest. Especially becomes important if you're developing tech that will impact everyday people.
Another thought. To me, racial oppression is like a virus that is replicated particularly when the oppressed are shamed into silence, complicity, or the sense the they have to adopt the memes, mental constructs of systematic oppression. So like, what do we mean when we say meritocracy?
- smsm42 9y agoI am still struggling to figure out who is being oppressed here. So, some folks wanted to promote some technology. Some other folks felt excited about it and submitted talks. After checking the identity of the speakers, it turned out it doesn't fit the wishes of the organizers, so the conference is cancelled. So Electron folks don't get the promotion, speakers don't get to speak, potential listeners don't get to listen. Was it because it was necessary to prevent oppression? Of whom?