Aurenheimer knew what he was doing was legally wrong: https://www.wired.com/2012/11/att-hacker-found-guilty/ https://www.wired.com/2012/11/att-hacker-found-guil

Aurenheimer knew what he was doing was legally wrong: https://www.wired.com/2012/11/att-hacker-found-guilty/ https://www.wired.com/2012/11/att-hacker-found-guilty/ although the charges were grossly excessive. Schwartz knew he was doing something legally wrong, because he hid in a closet to do it. (The charges against him were also grossly excessive.) I don't think these cases support your notion that EULAs were the issue. Nor do I think these extreme cases are cause for EULA concern for someone using software as it was obviously and reasonably intended to be used. Disclaimer: IANAL, and if you want real legal advice, go ask a real lawyer. Taking legal advice from the internet is foolish.