5 ms·
Thread-starter here. I have raised VC, PE, and debt. Early-stage and late stage. Here's my take on "ICO vs VC." ICO's: For the investor, they are akin to com
by untangle 9y ago
Thread-starter here.
I have raised VC, PE, and debt. Early-stage and late stage. Here's my take on "ICO vs VC."
ICO's:
For the investor, they are akin to commodity futures trading. The underlying value of the token is nil, as is the degree of control over the underlying property. But returns from price speculation can be very rich.
For the issuer, they have the money virtually without strings attached. There is no other form of assistance and no loyalty implied in either direction.
For example, I'd be shocked if there were positive "operational" returns from a token like the Brave coin. For that to happen, Google, Facebook, and the rest of the ad industry would have to grant sanction to the vendor of a Chromium-based browser startup yo turn the entire industry on its side. I doubt it. Seriously.
VCs:
For the investor, they get some modicum of ownership and control of the underlying property – sometimes not much but usually a lot. There is an implied responsibility to help with follow-on funding, but nothing solid. The investment is risky but not speculative.
For the issuer (of preferred shares AKA the company), they get the money with all kinds of strings attached. If the VC is top-tier (e.g., Fred, Kleiner, NEA, etc.), significant branding, easy intros, and many other benefits can accrue. If the VC is less prestigious, the operational impact is more neutral. (No VC can make your company grow or be successful – that's on you.)
My opinion:
1. If I could pull off an "ICO" (bad name) at my next company, I'd do it immediately. Great upside and little downside.
2. I say "immediately" because I don't think that this vehicle will last long in its current unregulated state. There will be failures. There are enemies. There will be evil deeds (fraud), and those deeds will involve unaccredited investors.
3. The ICO will be a short-term speed bump to VCs.
4. That all said, who wants to join me and start an "ICO production" company to create the coins and infrastructure for them to do their own ICOs? Speed is life, and I know some VCs... :)
- EGreg 9y agoThe investment is risky but not speculative. What's the distinction, in precise language?
- untangle 9y ago> What's the distinction, in precise language? Good question. I was using the language according to this definition: "A speculative investment is one with a high degree of risk where the focus of the purchaser is on price fluctuations. The investor buys the tradable good (financial instrument) in an attempt to profit from market value changes." https://marketbusinessnews.com/financial-glossary/speculative-investment/ https://marketbusinessnews.com/financial-glossary/speculativ...
- johnnydoebk 9y ago>> an "ICO production" company to create the coins and infrastructure for them to do their own ICOs? Isn't that what Ethereum is for?
- untangle 9y ago>> Isn't that what Ethereum is for? Sure, but Ethereum is a tool. An ICO is the result of a process. My thesis is that many companies, large and small, could benefit from an ICO...and that the majority of these know little about ICOs, Ethereum, or the relevant government regulations. The newco would present the following offer to the prospective customer: --We will ready you for a legal ICO within xx weeks. To do this, we will help you define the unit-of-value for your token and then put all systems, paperwork, and processes in place for the ICO. In return, we will receive coins worth nn% of the ICO as a success fee.-- This is a novel variation of an investment-banker play. Over time, large parts of the process could be systematized in software. Much of the ICO scene is scary and wild. [0] Pathfinders might be valued in this wilderness. These are my raw and unvetted thoughts. [0] https://www.ico-list.com/ https://www.ico-list.com/
- johnnydoebk 9y agoWhat will the tokens represent? Will it be an equivalent of company shares or something else?