3 ms·
I wasn't saying it wa snot a factor, and I totally agree with you, but the inverse square law per its exact definition does not apply here. I think uBeam is an
by trsohmers 9y ago
I wasn't saying it wa snot a factor, and I totally agree with you, but the inverse square law per its exact definition does not apply here.
I think uBeam is another Theranos, but granted at a much smaller scale. Still can't believe it has raised so much money and so much press without basic questions really being answered.
- dnautics 9y agoThe inverse square law generally applies for focused beams as well. Why wouldn't it?