3 ms·
So why not just snap to simplified Chinese? You'd get a billion person headstart and the ideograms are probably just as arbitrary.
by 13of40 9y ago
So why not just snap to simplified Chinese? You'd get a billion person headstart and the ideograms are probably just as arbitrary.
- Banthum 9y agoI did have that thought! But most likely these are all several characters in Chinese.
- claar 9y agoprotein: 蛋白 fat: 脂肪 salt: 盐 carbohydrate: 糖类 calorie: 千卡 I dunno...
- yorwba 9y agoI just checked a bag of noodles I had lying around, and it uses protein: 蛋白质, fat: 脂肪, sodium: 钠, carbohydrates: 碳水化合物, energy content: 能量 (measured in kJ: 千焦) So there is the additional problem of a. measuring different things (or using different units) and b. using different words to mean the same things.