4 ms·
In theory though, the market should address that right? e.g. a version of this that's $10k a year but can handle 10x the volume because you triage patients wit
by Deregibus 9y ago
In theory though, the market should address that right? e.g. a version of this that's $10k a year but can handle 10x the volume because you triage patients with competent nurses and PAs and save the expert's time for the cases where they can actually make a difference.
- rev_bird 9y agoStarting to sound an awful lot like the U.S. health care system...
- Deregibus 9y agoYeah, I had the same thoughts when I was writing that. The key difference is that the current system is so convoluted that there is almost no meaningful market for consumers on the actual care side of things.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- galago 9y agoA normal market would partially address this by adding doctors. In the USA, new medical schools have to be approved by the AMA.
- RamshackleJ 9y agowhy is this market failure automatically attributed to too much regulation instead of the wrong kind of regulation. Wealthy elites paying 40k to set a broken bone shows exactly why deregulating would be disastrous, medical decisions are rarely made rationally. There is a quote from the article that implies that these elites would pay anything. "But when you have kids, you jump the line. You just do. If you have the money, would you not spend it for that?" Unregulated markets do not work for this type of irrational actor. Please stop spreading lies about how to fix this problem. Instead maybe look at countries that regulate it correctly(Spain).