3 ms·
After reading your question text, it Sounds like you're already asking the right questions, so you probably don't need my help to think about this. But I was lo
by 19eightyfour 9y ago
After reading your question text, it Sounds like you're already asking the right questions, so you probably don't need my help to think about this. But I was looking for Qs to answer and hey why not.
On reading the title only, what I thought was: Yes, of course there is a business opportunity. And the reason why they are "so bad" is probably something to do with, the "learning function" is very inefficient.
By that I mean, what sort of feedback does one get on a JD? How can you measure a good JD versus a not good JD? How can you "A/B test"? As they say, if you don't measure it, you can't improve it. I think the lack of a tight feedback loop in JD contributes to making their improvement very slow over time.
Of course, I could be totally wrong about this. In my experience, tech job descriptions are not so bad, but other job descriptions ( anything non tech ) are awful. What are they even talking about? Of course, that might be since they just do not apply to me.
Whatever your idea would be -- I have an inkling ( not that I really have any idea, but hey ) that it could not simply just be another job posting board. It would have to be some other sort of business model. Maybe "A/B testing" for job posts? Anywhere, that probably already exists.
Finally, what just occurred to me is: HR / recruitment, it's very much "its own industry". They "have a way of doing things", and are sort of "shielded" from outside, by having a "monopoly" of sorts on the service they provide. Making it seem to me like they may be slow to adopt your "new fangled way" of doing their core business activity. Of course, I could have no idea what I'm talking about. Good luck! Sounds promising.