My bad, I thought you were referring to `typeof` being the code that still executes. Now I read that tweet more carefully and noticed the `getOptions()` call is

My bad, I thought you were referring to `typeof` being the code that still executes. Now I read that tweet more carefully and noticed the `getOptions()` call is in a comment. A strange feature that I suppose is useful when dealing with complex anonymous types, though in my experience such complex types tend to be named.