3 ms·
Other content in this article makes me a bit nervous. For example, it strongly implies at several points that the dental association has a conspiracy to keep p
by colah3 9y ago
Other content in this article makes me a bit nervous.
For example, it strongly implies at several points that the dental association has a conspiracy to keep patients using less safe technology because it leads to recurring surgeries:
> No one can argue against this logical access to immediate implantology.
> Surgeons like simple titanium screws because they mean more surgery. More surgery means more money.
- nether 9y agoI asked about this five months ago, and was told my theory was "asinine," and that here was no conspiracy. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13361392#13362425 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13361392#13362425 I'd be curious to hear lancewiggs's views on this tech.
- fractallyte 9y agoI've seen the actual rejection letters from prominent dental implant journals stating that this treatment is not of interest to their readership, and to seek publication elsewhere. Perhaps it's not a coordinated conspiracy, but this really is a 'WTF?' situation.