3 ms·
I think that's more security through obscurity rather than difficulty. Once the attacker figures out what the 2 hashing algorithms are, the scenario basically
by antisthenes 9y ago
I think that's more security through obscurity rather than difficulty.
Once the attacker figures out what the 2 hashing algorithms are, the scenario basically becomes the same as cracking hashes of 1 algorithm of increased difficulty (through number of passes)
So, like the other answer implied, the increased complexity of maintaining 2 algorithms might not be worth the obscurity trade-off in the end.
However, I am not a security professional either, so perhaps my opinion is not comprehensive enough.