3 ms·
Ah, thank you! So rather than try to rebut this myself, I'll let someone qualified do it: http://www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Wo
by zzalpha 9y ago
Ah, thank you!
So rather than try to rebut this myself, I'll let someone qualified do it:
http://www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Working-Paper-218-Ward-2015.pdf http://www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/wp-content/uploads/20...
And also:
https://thinkprogress.org/bjorn-lomborgs-new-paper-appears-to-have-no-basis-in-fact-f414ccafca08 https://thinkprogress.org/bjorn-lomborgs-new-paper-appears-t...
- akvadrako 9y agoI think that 2nd critique is spot on. I tried reading his paper yesterday and thought the graphs looked rather strange, with weird transitions in 2030, when he assumed all CO2 reduction efforts would stop. Wikipedia isn't very nice to him either: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bjørn_Lomborg#Formal_accusations_of_scientific_dishonesty https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bjørn_Lomborg#Formal_accusatio...