4 ms·
Maybe they didn't want gun patterns for safety reasons :) But seriously, static patterns work better for medium that is architecture. I just find it so ironic t
by veli_joza 9y ago
Maybe they didn't want gun patterns for safety reasons :) But seriously, static patterns work better for medium that is architecture. I just find it so ironic that Wolfram thought this is homage to HIS work. Does he ever mention Conway in any of his texts?
- Grue3 9y agoI mean it's literally a pattern from Wolfram's cellular automaton, even Conway himself wouldn't think it represents Game of Life.
- B1FF_PSUVM 9y agoNot in this one, for sure ... That is one damn insecure guy.
- scrumper 9y agoHe didn't say once in the entire article that he thought it was a homage to his work. He simply said it used his favorite rule. Everything he writes is about the beauty of this part of the 'computational universe', about giving the architects credit for choosing a pattern which blocks on average 50% of the light, about how they could potentially have extended the work to use more of the pattern. It's a very interesting article with very little of SW's infamous blow-hardiness in it. In other words, no "Wow Cambridge honored me and my amazing automata!", lots of "These patterns I've loved for years are on a building and that is really exciting."
- xrange 9y ago>Does he ever mention Conway in any of his texts? For "A New Kind of Science", here is the index entry: Conway, John H. (England/USA, 1937- ) and arithmetic recurrences, 1115 and Game of Life, 877, 880, 949 and iterated run-length encoding, 905 and non-periodic tilings, 943 in Preface, xiii and recursive sequences, 907 and universality of Life, 1117 https://www.wolframscience.com/nks/index/names/a-e.php?SearchIndex=Conway%2C%20John%20H.#searchword1/ https://www.wolframscience.com/nks/index/names/a-e.php?Searc...