3 ms·
The article says that he "had a third party submit his file to just about every software aggregation site", it would be handy to know how many that was, so that
by DougBTX 19y ago
The article says that he "had a third party submit his file to just about every software aggregation site", it would be handy to know how many that was, so that we can divide 16 by it.
- tzury 19y agothere are software available on the net that do this automatically for you. see at: http://www.google.com/search?q=auto+submit+your+software http://www.google.com/search?q=auto+submit+your+software
- jcl 19y agoIt gives numbers in the original blog post: http://successfulsoftware.net/2007/08/16/the-software-awards-scam/ http://successfulsoftware.net/2007/08/16/the-software-awards... "According to the report I received 2 weeks after submissions began “awardmestars” is now listed on 218 sites, pending on 394 sites and has been rejected by 421 sites. Approximately 7% of the sites that listed the software emailed me that it had won an award (I don’t know how many have displayed it with an award, without informing me). With 394 pending sites it might win quite a few more awards yet." "Addendum 2 -- 23 awards ‘won’ at the latest count."
- hermitcrab 19y agoIt is all in the original article: http://successfulsoftware.net/2007/08/16/the-software-awards-scam/ http://successfulsoftware.net/2007/08/16/the-software-awards... And there is an update: http://successfulsoftware.net/2007/12/13/the-software-awards-scam-update/ http://successfulsoftware.net/2007/12/13/the-software-awards...