3 ms·
> This is not composition. That's basically the author's point. > Once I understood what they meant by “composition”, I was even more surprised to find that I
by gipp 9y ago
> This is not composition.
That's basically the author's point.
> Once I understood what they meant by “composition”, I was even more surprised to find that I agreed with this assertion.
- porpoisemonkey 9y agoGood point - I think I misunderstood the purpose of the article. I'll leave the original comment as a matter of record.