3 ms·
if using Chrome meant you needed to step on three kittens a day, I think I would agree with you. but it's just browser preference, so the whole "moral" thing f
by 2bitencryption 9y ago
if using Chrome meant you needed to step on three kittens a day, I think I would agree with you.
but it's just browser preference, so the whole "moral" thing factors in less than whatever logo is printed on the pen I take from the junk drawer. I just want a pen that works.
- wpietri 9y agoOne of those words that is often a tell is "just". That's where people sweep a lot of things under the rug. Including here, where you've hidden the fact that you made an unsupported assertion that assumes an answer to the question we're discussing. I'll note that it's a different bad argument, one about consumer choice, than the one I was addressing, which was about business choices. But consumer choices too always have implications. That's why, e.g., boycotts are a thing: small decisions add up.
- braveo 9y agoI'm going to have to agree with 2bitencryption here. Everything is a "moral choice" when the person demanding the choice feels strongly about it, but that typically means you just lack perspective. At the end of the day we're talking about browsers and websites, and while people may not LIKE it, when a business writes software it's a business decision as to whether or not they'll target all browsers or a subset.
- wpietri 9y agoBy all means, keep on asserting things without demonstrating them and ignoring arguments and examples to the contrary. It doesn't actually convince, but I'm sure it makes you feel better.
- braveo 9y agoI can tell you're young.
- wpietri 9y agoOh, tell me more, anonymous coward! Your perception knows no bounds.
- 2bitencryption 9y agoi've finally done it, i've found a live r/iamverysmart!
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]