3 ms·

You mean that same dossier of which broad swaths were verified by the intelligence community to have been correct?

• rdtsc 9y ago
  What was verified? Once they stuck the golden showers bit and the blackmail, other stuff to be credible would need some solid evidence/ Have you seen any? I haven't. It's a bit like having a conversation with someone and as soon as they start talking about chemtrails it's an uphill battle to take anything from them seriously after that.
  • travmatt 9y ago
    The mayflower meeting happened pretty much as described in the Steele dossier. Seth Abramson made a nice tweet storm summary. There's even pictures of the individuals there in question: https://theintellectualist.co/reporter-makes-convincing-case-alleging-treason-on-the-part-of-trump-and-his-associates/ https://theintellectualist.co/reporter-makes-convincing-case... Also, its odd to me that people intentionally try to misrepresent raw intelligence. Raw intelligence is so named because it's an amalgamation of different sources and even possible rumors that were deemed pertinent to include. Intelligence officials regularly deal with these, so there are established procedures to verify its contents independently. So to hear you say that since one thing may be wrong, then everything is wrong, therefore it's fake, seems deceitful. Lastly, we have the curious fact that most every Russian implicated in cooperating with the Steele dossier had been murdered, found dead, or arrested by the FSB shortly after its existence became known to Russian security services. Id also suggest it's odd for a sitting president to repeatedly obstruct an investigation that he steadfastly maintains will find nothing.