4 ms·
I hope they still maintain the ruby gem version of LESS. LESS is beautiful as it is. But processing LESS code in the browser would mean that I can't use LESS.j
by SingAlong 16y ago
I hope they still maintain the ruby gem version of LESS.
LESS is beautiful as it is. But processing LESS code in the browser would mean that I can't use LESS.js for mobile web apps. Although there are mobile devices with 1ghz processors already out in the market, there is still a lag in rendering mediocre-weight pages that contain js on mobile devices.
P.S: Congrats on keeping LESS simpler.
- stevelosh 16y agoYou can run less.js from the command line to precompile if you have Node.js installed, and it's much faster than the Ruby gem.