4 ms·
Her employer is a company. Companies don't have the emotions people have. In large organisations, the effect of employee lawsuits may even be beneficial, becau
by matt4077 9y ago
Her employer is a company. Companies don't have the emotions people have.
In large organisations, the effect of employee lawsuits may even be beneficial, because it allows for a mechanism to escalate serious issues before they become even worse, while the high barriers in terms of cost, emotional burden etc. serve to discourage frivolous complaints.
- tertius 9y ago> Companies don't have the emotions people have. You forget, companies solely consist of people and are solely owned by people. It's a legal vehicle. People, of which companies consist, have feelings and emotions.
- saiya-jin 9y agoHave you ever actually worked anywhere? Any place I've seen, from 3 man job to 100,000+ multinational megacorps, many people take some things personally, be it regular workers or managers. It's actually more rare to see cold hard logical-only approach, even in IT. The other part of your comment - again, nice on paper, but never seen this in real life, at least not in big companies.
- shard972 9y agoI'm no fan of Telsa but I feel like any large company with a decent PR team would be a little anxious with an employee suing you and talking publicly about it. It's their job to make the company look good so it would seem logical they would want to try and get this water under the bridge. If they thought it was valid, it seems the PR team would push for settlement without admitting wrongdoing but if they really do believe she is out on a limb, firing her does seems like the go to option and let it go to court to try and clear the charge.