5 ms·
Tesla isn't merely claiming they've met her needs, they're actually claiming that she's received privileged treatment because she's a woman: > Tesla added that
by SomeStupidPoint 9y ago
Tesla isn't merely claiming they've met her needs, they're actually claiming that she's received privileged treatment because she's a woman:
> Tesla added that Vandermeyden had been granted numerous positions “over other more qualified candidates” and was “given special treatment and opportunities for advancement that were unwarranted based on her qualifications”.
- ocdtrekkie 9y agoTesla says, and Vandermeyden says something else. But if this is going to court, I suspect the outcome is very much going to depend on which party can prove their side of the story.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- JoeAltmaier 9y agoWow they must be really screwed up at Tesla then.
- softawre 9y agoThey didn't mention "b/c she was a woman" at all.
- jasonlotito 9y ago> Tesla isn't merely claiming they've met her needs, they're actually claiming that she's received privileged treatment because she's a woman: If that's true, they are admitting to sexual discrimination and opening themselves up to further lawsuits.
- NotSammyHagar 9y agoI didn't see where they said it was special treatment b/c she was a woman. They just said it was special treatment (based on my reading of the article).