All your arguments are also true in the reverse. It's not like analysts give programmers a proof that the work they should do is without contradictions. There a

All your arguments are also true in the reverse. It's not like analysts give programmers a proof that the work they should do is without contradictions. There are also many decisions that programmers make which actually do have big impact, although nobody really notices because there is no one to understand. > But as I told, the real difference is how much supervision you need, how likely you are to create organizational mess and so on. Yeah, but this is true for any skill. Anybody who has skill doesn't need supervision. It does not by itself prove that some role has "bigger impact". > Responsibility is not about being punished nor height of that punishment. I am talking about "having responsibility", you're talking about "being responsible". Those are two different things.