3 ms·

I think there is a difference between longevity and stagnation. You are describing stagnation, but I don't think that is what the SA is about. When people see t

I think there is a difference between longevity and stagnation. You are describing stagnation, but I don't think that is what the SA is about. When people see the former, they may assume the latter. This is understandable - people make all kinds of simplistic generalizations to reduce cognitive load but like any bias it is one you should be mindful of. In hindsight I see longevity as a mistake - because this bias exists and it limits opportunity even when misapplied. Also I find it does take more work - or at least more attention - to stay current when you aren't being pressured by your job.

goldleader71 9y ago
I am 20+ years in and am just realizing the truth of this perception. I knew that it was more and more acceptable to move around, but missed the memo that staying put is more and more unacceptable. If no change is 1 and constant change is 10, I am probably a 6. This is a wake up call to pick up more and more newer things. The trick is to balance staying relevant with chasing the shiny object and changing just for the sake of change. Change is only good if it is better.
- sbov 9y ago
  It can be difficult to quantify "better". It is easier to quantify "different". If the goal is to truly learn, try the things most different from what you already know first. Even if it's not strictly better, it will be different, and it will open your mind to different ways to view problems.