5 ms·
Globally? No, that's a very USA-centric view. Terrorism has killed hundreds of people globally this month alone. It has destabilized (if not outright destroyed)
by jquery 9y ago
Globally? No, that's a very USA-centric view. Terrorism has killed hundreds of people globally this month alone. It has destabilized (if not outright destroyed) many countries over the past 2-3 decades.
- devoply 9y agoYeah it has killed hundreds this month mostly again due to mismanagement of response to terror and management of the prep for terror. It's a significantly different thing to compare terrorism in 3rd world countries who are routinely targets of both non-State and State sponsored terror because lack of control mechanisms and terror in developed countries or countries with stable governance systems.
- xyzzyz 9y agoGlobally speaking, USA imperialism is bigger threat than the terrorism with regards to the body count metric.
- vkou 9y agoTerrorism has not destroyed countries across the past 2-3 decades. Civil wars did. Many of them have either been started by, or fueled by American foreign policy. So, yes, your country being destabilized by a civil war is a real threat if you live in the global south. In America? It's not going to happen because of a few mouthbreathers decided to cook some bathtub C4.