4 ms·
I recently came to believe (correct me if I'm wrong) that the recommended XOFs SHAKE128 and SHAKE256 are actually nice and fast, but often when people talk abou
by pshc 9y ago
I recently came to believe (correct me if I'm wrong) that the recommended XOFs SHAKE128 and SHAKE256 are actually nice and fast, but often when people talk about SHA-3 they focus on the slower "drop-in replacements" like SHA3-256 which are quite conservative.
- baby 9y agoYes SHAKE is faster than SHA-3 because of "better" parameter choices.