Is the core argument here is that SaaS enables the success of software companies that have little value and that "post-SaaS" means that those companies die? Th

Is the core argument here is that SaaS enables the success of software companies that have little value and that "post-SaaS" means that those companies die? That doesn't really ring true to me. That already happens, doesn't it? SaaS as a pricing model or platform strategy in and of itself won't do shit for you if you have a terrible idea, right? Or is the author trying to argue that SaaS will eventually become a race to the bottom and that the market should shift towards value-based pricing?