3 ms·
The article seems largely theoretical in nature - "efficient Actor implementations are possible". Why no links to these implementations? And if they actually do
by swannodette 16y ago
The article seems largely theoretical in nature - "efficient Actor implementations are possible". Why no links to these implementations? And if they actually do exist how do they compare to Clojure's use-it-today high performance single-machine concurrency implementation?
Also, his counterpoints sound like they either add incidental complexity or refer to papers not implementations.
In anycase, Rich wasn't banging on Actors. He simply was arguing for his approach to concurrency over one of the most popular Actor implementations actively used in production today - Erlang.
And finally, here's a pretty interesting project for distributed computing with Clojure: http://github.com/amitrathore/swarmiji http://github.com/amitrathore/swarmiji
- calibraxis 16y agoDid you check out the author's "pure actor-based programming language", Humus? (It's not easy to notice, as he only mentioned it once, and white-on-bright-blue isn't easy to read.) http://www.dalnefre.com/wp/humus/ http://www.dalnefre.com/wp/humus/