The NATO agreement reached in 2014 was: >aim to move towards the 2% guideline within a decade with a view to meeting their NATO Capability Targets and filling

The NATO agreement reached in 2014 was: >aim to move towards the 2% guideline within a decade with a view to meeting their NATO Capability Targets and filling NATO's capability shortfalls. It's not 2024 yet, and note that the agreement is to 'aim' - not exactly binding. As for the article you yourself linked to: >The report only models policies in place up to last Nov. 1. Since then, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's administration has made a number of significant climate policy changes through the Pan-Canadian Framework on Clean Growth and Climate Change, an agreement between federal, provincial, and territorial governments to reduce emissions published on December 9. >"I think there are a lot of reasons to believe we are actually better off than the report suggests," Flanagan said. >More will be need to be done, however, to meet their targets, said Jake Schmidt, international program director at Natural Resources Defense Council. http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_112964.htm http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_112964.htm