>Obviously ``` (f a b c) ``` > is the same "amount" of code as > `(f a b c)` Yes, obviously! But they do not take the same number of lines - one is th

>Obviously ``` (f a b c) ``` > is the same "amount" of code as > `(f a b c)` Yes, obviously! But they do not take the same number of lines - one is three lines and the other is one line. It's sort of funny to me- number of lines doesn't paint the picture we want it to... so let's change the metric! Our code is special, anyway.