3 ms·
I agree. Google doesn't want a license agreement. As pointed out below, yes, there is investment, but I think Google/Alphabet is out for blood and the investmen
by ianamartin 9y ago
I agree. Google doesn't want a license agreement. As pointed out below, yes, there is investment, but I think Google/Alphabet is out for blood and the investment dollars will be recouped in the civil settlement if not the arbitration with Levandowski.
Either way, I don't think Google cares. They want to be first on the market. And based on how badly Uber has been flouting the law, I suspect Google gets there first no matter what. This just slows Uber down.
It won't matter though. Money will change hands. And that's about it. Google/Alphabet/Waymo/Lyft will be first to market in a pretty shitty way, followed by Uber. The tech world and early adopters will go nuts and in this case probably die in a fire. Then Apple and Tesla will come in with a far superior safety/user experience and take over.
None of this really matters at this point. It's a waiting game. This is what Apple always does and what Tesla has started doing: wait for the early entries in the market to do their thing, learn from their mistakes, and pwn the market later with better UX and marketing.
- jacquesm 9y agoI don't think that's the whole story. If Google would let it be known that you can take a bunch of IP and walk out the front door to a competitor that would be a very expensive signal. So for them this is as much about this concrete case as it is about how Google will deal with situation where their IP grows legs.
- euyyn 9y ago> Early adopters will [...] probably die in a fire. Then [...] Tesla will come in with a far superior safety [...] and take over. Well, for the moment, the record is exactly the opposite of that prediction.