4 ms·
There's no particular reason to make it a rental. They can still put whatever contractual restraints they want on a sale, they just have to enforce those under
by URSpider94 9y ago
There's no particular reason to make it a rental. They can still put whatever contractual restraints they want on a sale, they just have to enforce those under contract law, not via patent law.
The entire reasoning for bringing a patent lawsuit is that it allows them to sue the refillers/resellers, instead of having to sue millions of individual customers who might have violated a shrink-wrap contract with Lexmark. Going into a cartridge rental business, besides adding a ton of overhead, wouldn't really change that -- they'd still need to go after the renters one at a time.
- Glyptodon 9y agoWith a rental wouldn't purchasers of used cartridges essentially be knowingly buying stolen property? (Which seems very straightforward in terms its legal ramifications compared to other options.)
- URSpider94 9y agoIANAL, but I think you'd have to prove that, ie identify the chain of custody for the device and prove that the lease was broken.