4 ms·
Penrose is not just arguing for objective collapse. Penrose is arguing for something computationally more powerful than objective collapse.
by Chronos 9y ago
Penrose is not just arguing for objective collapse. Penrose is arguing for something computationally more powerful than objective collapse.
- manyoso 9y agoIf gravity plays a role in wave function collapse that will pose serious questions for the Church-Turing hypothesis. It might very well make it impossible for non-Quantum computers to accurately model quantum gravity. Penrose does not argue for "something computationally more powerful than objective collapse" rather, he argues that the physical Church-Turing thesis is false due to quantum gravity. Something he is an expert on, btw.
- Chronos 9y ago"gravity plays a role in wave function collapse that will pose serious questions for the Church-Turing hypothesis" Says who? Penrose is blacklisted, cite someone else.