4 ms·

> JS is not parallelized https://johnresig.com/blog/web-workers/ https://johnresig.com/blog/web-workers/ https://ponyfoo.com/articles/understanding-javascript

> JS is not parallelized https://johnresig.com/blog/web-workers/ https://johnresig.com/blog/web-workers/ https://ponyfoo.com/articles/understanding-javascript-async-await https://ponyfoo.com/articles/understanding-javascript-async-... > Python is also compiled to a bytecode before interpretation; were still don't call it a compiled language. https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/24558/is-python-interpreted-or-compiled https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/2455... > macros aren't significantly faster > you can always precompile your abstraction on program load at the expense of slower start times http://www.ilikebigbits.com/blog/2015/12/6/the-fastest-code-is-the-code-that-never-runs http://www.ilikebigbits.com/blog/2015/12/6/the-fastest-code-... > How can I ask it what type a function returns or what types it's arguments should take? http://www.braveclojure.com/core-functions-in-depth/ http://www.braveclojure.com/core-functions-in-depth/

weberc2 9y ago
> https://johnresig.com/blog/web-workers/ https://johnresig.com/blog/web-workers/ Sorry, I should have said "JS doesn't support shared memory parallelism for all intents and purposes, so memory sharing concerns are a moot point". > https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/2455.. https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/2455.... This supports my point; not sure why you're posting this... > http://www.ilikebigbits.com/blog/2015/12/6/the-fastest-code-.. http://www.ilikebigbits.com/blog/2015/12/6/the-fastest-code-.... This is also congruent with my points; if this is meant to be contradiction, you'll have to clarify. > http://www.ilikebigbits.com/blog/2015/12/6/the-fastest-code-.. http://www.ilikebigbits.com/blog/2015/12/6/the-fastest-code-.... I'm not spending any more of my time skimming these mysterious links; this is a very straightforward question and you've evaded it several times and then referred me to an 8 kiloword document. What gives?

weberc2 9y ago

> https://johnresig.com/blog/web-workers/ https://johnresig.com/blog/web-workers/ Sorry, I should have said "JS doesn't support shared memory parallelism for all intents and purposes, so memory sharing concerns are a moot point". > https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/2455.. https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/2455.... This supports my point; not sure why you're posting this... > http://www.ilikebigbits.com/blog/2015/12/6/the-fastest-code-.. http://www.ilikebigbits.com/blog/2015/12/6/the-fastest-code-.... This is also congruent with my points; if this is meant to be contradiction, you'll have to clarify. > http://www.ilikebigbits.com/blog/2015/12/6/the-fastest-code-.. http://www.ilikebigbits.com/blog/2015/12/6/the-fastest-code-.... I'm not spending any more of my time skimming these mysterious links; this is a very straightforward question and you've evaded it several times and then referred me to an 8 kiloword document. What gives?