? > false. And also FUD. PAN can be used for more tacking that Aadhaar. But pan isn't being used - difference between can do and doing. > false, strictly wha

? > false. And also FUD. PAN can be used for more tacking that Aadhaar. But pan isn't being used - difference between can do and doing. > false, strictly what's mandated by parliament in the Aadhaar bill. In a democracy parliament is suprement, not some privacy-wallahs. Proof? Supreme court is hearing case because Government broke the law. Proof of your assertion? >true, so? It's mandated by parliament. It's like a mandatory tax ID. Infringes on my right to privacy, while not doing anything to help the country. >6) For demonstrably false gains (the AP results, their false reduction in costs claims) >false Proof? You make loots of claims, but don't have anything to back it up. All of the things I have claimed are true. You just say false. I am happy to listen and read any links you have which show your position as true.