> т is a homoglyph of T—because one could mistake one for the other. I believe gp is talking about the font. In some fonts (especially italic/cursive), the let

> т is a homoglyph of T—because one could mistake one for the other. I believe gp is talking about the font. In some fonts (especially italic/cursive), the letter "т" looks like "m", and nothing like "T" -- so it's really hard to say with which one it's "visually equivalent".