4 ms·
Absolutely not. The response to censorship should not be to make things easier for the censor. Anyway, the idea is unworkable as the user's client could simply
by knome 9y ago
Absolutely not. The response to censorship should not be to make things easier for the censor.
Anyway, the idea is unworkable as the user's client could simply lie about what URI it's going to send after the encrypted connection is setup.
- vbezhenar 9y ago> Absolutely not. The response to censorship should not be to make things easier for the censor. It's not about making things easier for the censor. It's already easy. It's about making life easier for people who have to live with censorship (pretty much the entire world, I guess?). > Anyway, the idea is unworkable as the user's client could simply lie about what URI it's going to send after the encrypted connection is setup. Good server should response with error, I guess.
- thriftwy 9y agoPeople should be fighting for their rights and freedoms, not make their slave life easier.