4 ms·

Thank you! I found the following chart useful: ) machine and assembly languages: simple syntax, simple semantics ) procedural languages: complex syntax,

by zmonx 9y ago

Thank you! I found the following chart useful: *) machine and assembly languages: simple syntax, simple semantics *) procedural languages: complex syntax, AST not available, many language constructs *) Smalltalk, LISP, Prolog: AST available, few language constructs Source: http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/ulrich/prolog2009.pdf http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/ulrich/prolog2009.pdf

bordercases 9y ago
Well now I must definitely use Smalltalk!
- zmonx 9y ago
  It's definitely worth a look! Richard O'Keefe, one of the most highly regarded and accomplished Prolog programmers, even wrote his own Smalltalk implementation too: http://www.cs.otago.ac.nz/staffpriv/ok/software.htm http://www.cs.otago.ac.nz/staffpriv/ok/software.htm