3 ms·
> wretched excess of nineteenth century typography. I feel compelled to defend nineteenth century typography here :) I will point to the work of pierre & ferm
by tribby 9y ago
> wretched excess of nineteenth century typography.
I feel compelled to defend nineteenth century typography here :)
I will point to the work of pierre & fermin didot[1]. arguably some of the most enduring in type history - currently it's used a lot in fashion. you just don't like the style of these examples, which is totally reasonable.
1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Didot_(typeface) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Didot_(typeface)
- jejones3141 9y agoPoint well taken re Didot. Perhaps I should have said Victorian.
- tribby 9y agoI disagree with that one too, but maybe we have different taste. akzidenz-grotesk[1] was first released in 1898 and it will probably look modern to you (it was the basis for helvetica). there were also a lot of titling gothic fonts that came over from germany and britain and are still used today in tons of movies and more cinematic advertisements. I'm not trying to create an argument or anything, but if you look at type history most of it was sorted out around that very period, probably because the price and expertise required for printing was going down. so you'll find typefaces you like (and don't like) in almost every era. the modern typefaces we know and love today are mostly remixes from a few highly productive periods. we've been making tiny variations on existing fonts for centuries -- lettering by bodoni is from the renaissance but it's so contemporary and magazine-y. 1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akzidenz-Grotesk https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akzidenz-Grotesk