4 ms·
Sidekiq by Mike Perham http://sidekiq.org/ http://sidekiq.org/ Over 1MM annual revenue https://www.indiehackers.com/businesses/sidekiq https://www.indiehackers
by LeonidBugaev 9y ago
Sidekiq by Mike Perham http://sidekiq.org/ http://sidekiq.org/
Over 1MM annual revenue https://www.indiehackers.com/businesses/sidekiq https://www.indiehackers.com/businesses/sidekiq
- rcshubhadeep 9y agohmmm... It is OSS though. Not sure we can consider it as a single person company.
- r3bl 9y agoIt's still a single person company (as in, the company with only one employee). The fact that more people contribute to the company's product doesn't change that. As long as other open source contributors are not payed for their contributions, I would still qualify it as a single person company. It's just that the company's approach is a little bit different than the traditional one.
- mxstbr 9y agoIf you were to define it that narrowly any company that doesn't do its own accounting is not longer a "single person company". At that point I don't think you'd be left with many companies that make much revenue, so even though the code is open source that still counts as a single person company imo.
- flipp3r 9y agoNot completely. However is commits or line changes mean anything, you can see at https://github.com/mperham/sidekiq/graphs/contributors https://github.com/mperham/sidekiq/graphs/contributors that 1 person did approx 90%+ of the work on the code itself.
- rcshubhadeep 9y agoAnd why was I down voted? Really, I did not even express a strong opinion. I kind of expressed a doubt. This is really strange. I may not know something and I may have doubt. I believe a community like HN is a good place to express them and get corrected. I am shocked to see that this is not really welcomed here.