4 ms·
Moscow region is swampy all right. And I've heard that Washington DC (being an artificial capital) is located on a swamp too. I think the reason is simple, "Br
by thriftwy 9y ago
Moscow region is swampy all right. And I've heard that Washington DC (being an artificial capital) is located on a swamp too.
I think the reason is simple, "Braindead" style. It's just that lizard folk prefer the marshes, so that's where we have to be.
- FiveDegrees 9y agoHence the "Drain the swamp" political rhetoric of the last US election cycle.
- hx87 9y agoFWIW, Berlin and Moscow both mean "Swamp Town".
- thaumasiotes 9y agoThe reason is simple. Swamps are commercially strategic, since they're located on rivers. For most of history, shipping goods over land didn't make much sense.
- pacaro 9y agoThis makes perfect sense, I guess they are swamps because that's the combination of rivers and flat ground
- thriftwy 9y agoWe would have Berlin on Rhine and Moscow on Volga river then. Much better climate and much busier rivers commercially. For some reason, capitals tend to be on undesirable rivers.
- Piskvorrr 9y ago...if this was the only condition for "what city becomes a capital." Looking at Germany, there's Hamburg, Köln, München...all on nice rivers, but none of them were the capital of Prussia when Germany was first unified - since Prussia was the essential driver of that political process, Berlin became the capital. Something of a coincidence in the grand scheme of things, really.
- thriftwy 9y agoFor some reason, it's usually a faraway landlocked province that triggers unification. Not the rich and coastal ones. Turin-Savoy in Italy, Prussia in Germany.
- tmnvix 9y agoCanberra also.