3 ms·
It'd be interesting to see an overlay of areas that are inhospitable to wild animals, perhaps excluding birds. Mostly because that would be a useful indication
by terminado 9y ago
It'd be interesting to see an overlay of areas that are inhospitable to wild animals, perhaps excluding birds. Mostly because that would be a useful indication of how much inhabitable land is monopolized by humans.
- chrismeller 9y agoWhat does that even mean? Even in the Arctic, Antarctic, and Sahara there are wild animals that can survive. Just because there's no room for a house on the side of the Rockies in Colorado doesn't mean people don't hike it or animals don't inhabit it.
- brewdad 9y agoExactly what wild animals would we be considering? Pigeons live in the wild in virtually every temperate city on earth. I think there are coyotes in New York's Central Park.
- bagacrap 9y agoMammals that are at least as big as humans perhaps.