Right-- they are suffering because they entered a training regimen during which, as the author stated, wellness is not an option. The point is a therapist is t

Right-- they are suffering because they entered a training regimen during which, as the author stated, wellness is not an option. The point is a therapist is trained not only to look for high levels of work-related stress, but also for signs that the patient is at risk of causing serious, long-term damage to their psyche. It's certainly not fool-proof. But the author seems persuaded that the stress is so high that it requires a new, idiosyncratic moral system for residents. Before doing something that drastic and so obviously prone to confirmation bias, I ask why checking in regularly with a trained, objective third party observer isn't an option.