4 ms·
Derek Parfit's Persons and Reasons deals with this question a little more formally, resolving the tension with the concept of "rational irrationality"[0, p12]
by kyleschiller 9y ago
Derek Parfit's Persons and Reasons deals with this question a little more formally, resolving the tension with the concept of "rational irrationality"[0, p12]
I think what Nielsen is getting at here is the idea that a commitment to accuracy doesn't necessarily entail an unwillingness to be wrong. As in Weber's case, the wrongness of one's work doesn't necessarily imply it's unimportance.
[0] http://www.chadpearce.com/Home/BOOKS/161777473-Derek-Parfit-Reasons-and-Persons.pdf http://www.chadpearce.com/Home/BOOKS/161777473-Derek-Parfit-...
- amasad 9y agoI think this is the most important part of this discussion. Rationality, roughly defined is about achieving your goals. And Parfit's example about becoming temporarily irrational to achieve a goal that otherwise wouldn't be achievable then it's still rational .