4 ms·
Erm... I stand corrected, you're right. I think I was confused by the description under section 14.30 (http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec14.html#se
by piotrSikora 16y ago
Erm... I stand corrected, you're right. I think I was confused by the description under section 14.30 (http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec14.html#sec14.30 http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec14.html#sec14...).
- mjw 16y agoNo worries. Some of those HTTP RFCs are pretty crufty - there is a cleanup project in the works apparently: http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/charter/ http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/charter/