Human visual hardware isn't very good. Slow integration time, very small (~10 degree) high-resolution area with mediocre resolving power (~1moa). Good dynamic r

Human visual hardware isn't very good. Slow integration time, very small (~10 degree) high-resolution area with mediocre resolving power (~1moa). Good dynamic range, but more than is really necessary for driving. A few tricks like ocular microtremors. Everything else you said is a factor of software, not hardware. Perhaps don't be so condescending unless you actually have a really good point. You don't need to know much about biology to point out that humans get by without very fancy sensor hardware.