3 ms·
Or maybe because .COM format was invented before .EXE format (since .COM is simpler)? Just guessing.
by vram22 9y ago
Or maybe because .COM format was invented before .EXE format (since .COM is simpler)? Just guessing.
- colejohnson66 9y agoMaybe someone could disassemble DOS to find out why? Sounds like a project for me this weekend
- lucb1e 9y agoIirc, MS-DOS is open source and in some museum now.
- maxlybbert 9y agoDOS 1.1 is available online from the Computer History Museum ( http://www.computerhistory.org/press/ms-source-code.html http://www.computerhistory.org/press/ms-source-code.html ). But I think that may be too early to be useful.
- int_19h 9y agoThey also offer DOS 2.0. But DOS had EXE, COM and BAT files since version 1.0.
- maxlybbert 9y agoThank you.
- int_19h 9y agoSee my reply in another branch. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14433246 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14433246