4 ms·
I've been following this for a few months. It looks neat but too new to entrust to any major project in my opinion. Also seems too new to put together and mean
by jarym 9y ago
I've been following this for a few months.
It looks neat but too new to entrust to any major project in my opinion. Also seems too new to put together and meaningful performance comparison since it still seems they're finding frequent improvements.
I really wished this could have been distributed as an extension rather than a totally separate Postgres package. It is much easier to play with extensions... I read somewhere they can't do it since they have to modify non-extensible bits of code:(
- pgaddict 9y agoEverything is "too new" at some point, and matures over time. But I don't know why a performance comparison would not be meaningful at this point? I mean, it may get obsolete soon, but it's the only way to guide optimizations efforts - you do a test, decide what makes most sense to improve (cost/benefit) and then you fix it. Then you do the test again. I'm sure Bitnine developers do such benchmarks as part of development, but perhaps they decided not to publish that at this point. That's perfectly understandable - development benchmarks are one thing, but publishing the results requires much more care. Particularly when it's a comparison with other products. But hey, there's nothing simpler than doing a quick benchmark on your own - after all, the best benchmark is one modeling your particular use case.