No, not at all. The case for protected bike lanes is rock solid, but it's been tread so many times that it's only worth addressing the article itself: https://

No, not at all. The case for protected bike lanes is rock solid, but it's been tread so many times that it's only worth addressing the article itself: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridge's_law_of_headlines https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridge's_law_of_headline... Remember, in this age conflict, not content, drives journalist profit.