3 ms·
> it requires surprising effort to ignite the hydrogen in an airship They burned like tinder, in large numbers. The following is a list of hydrogen-filled airs
by fnj 9y ago
> it requires surprising effort to ignite the hydrogen in an airship
They burned like tinder, in large numbers. The following is a list of hydrogen-filled airships which burned. These exclude losses due to enemy action.
1902, *Pax* explodes over Paris
1908, Zeppelin LZ-4 caught fire while moored
1912, *Akron* explodes off Atlantic City
1913, Zeppelin LZ-18 caught fire during test flight
1915, Zeppelin L-4 burned when struck by lightning
1915, SL-6 explodes after takeoff
1915, Zeppelin L-18 burned in hangar
1916, Zeppelin L-6 burned when being inflated
1918, 4 Zeppelins and one other burned in mass hangar fire
1918, Zeppelin L-59 explodes during flight
1919, US Navy blimp C-8 explodes while landing
1919, British blimp N.S.11 burned in flight
1919, US blimp *Wingfoot Express* burned over Chicago
1920, US Navy blimp D-1 burned at base
1921, US Navy blimp C-3 burned at Hampton Roads, VA
1921, British rigid airship R.38 broke in half and burned in mid-air
1921, US Navy blimps D-6 and C-10 burned in hangar fire
1922, US Army *Roma* struck power lines and burned
1922, US Army blimp C-2 burned while exiting hangar
1923, French Navy *Dixmude* struck by lightning and burned in flight
1930, British rigid airship R.101 struck hillside during storm and burned
1934 Soviet blimps V4, V5, and V7 all burned in a hangar fire
1935, Soviet blimp V7-bis struck a powerline and burned
1937, Zeppelin *Hindenburg* caught fire due to unknown cause and burned
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_airship_accidents
[1] http://www.zeppelinhistory.com/zeppelin-facts/airship-accidents/
- kmm 9y agoSo less than one incident per year, most with a low amount of casualties, on what I assume was quite a big population of airships. And that is without modern technology, because we've made some progress in flame retardant materials I find that rather makes the case of bringing back hydrogen filled airships.
- CommieBobDole 9y ago> what I assume was quite a big population of airships That might be a bad assumption. Hard to find numbers for all producers but based on the various lists of airships (links below), it looks like total number of airships produced was probably in the "few hundred" range, and only a small portion of those were in use at any given time. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Zeppelins https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Zeppelins https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_airships_of_the_United_States_Navy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_airships_of_the_United... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Sch%C3%BCtte-Lanz_airships https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Sch%C3%BCtte-Lanz_airs...
- BatFastard 9y agoLooks like biggest risk the the hanger! One would hope we could avoid such risks with today's level of technology.